medchemexpress hy Search Results


94
MedChemExpress tmp195
Tmp195, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/tmp195/product/MedChemExpress
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tmp195 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
MedChemExpress asgr1 knockdown group
Figure 1. <t>ASGR1</t> is critical in the progression of liver cancer. A, ASGR1 screening process based on the GEO and TCGA databases. B, IHC score of ASGR1 in matched tumor and nontumor tissues from 113 patients with liver cancer (left; the median and upper and lower quartiles of tumor areas are plotted in a box-and-whisker plot, P < 0.0001, paired Student t test); comparison of tumor volume between high and low IHC scores (middle, means SD, P ¼ 0.0469, unpaired Student t test); IHC scores of liver cancer tissues with and without vascular invasion (right; P ¼ 0.0366, unpaired Student t test). C, Left, IHC scores of tumor tissues at different pathological grades (P ¼ 0.0187, ANOVA). Right, survival analysis of patients with liver cancer with high and low IHC scores of ASGR1 (P ¼ 0.0022, log-rank test). D, Construction of ASGR1 knockout mice and establishment of the HDI model. The coding regions in ASGR1 transcript (ENSMUST00000146411.8) were precisely knocked out by CRISPR/Cas9 technology to construct ASGR1/ mice. Six-week ASGR1/ mice and wild-type (ASGR1wt/wt) mice were rapidly injected via tail vein with 2 mL of PBS containing 10 mg sleeping beauty (SB) transposon, 25 mg C-MYC, and 25 mg N-Ras plasmids to establish the HDI model. E, PET/CT results and livers of mice 2 weeks after the establishment of HDI model. F, Survival analysis of ASGR1wt/wt mice and ASGR1/ mice in HDI model (P ¼ 0.03, Log-rank test).
Asgr1 Knockdown Group, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/asgr1 knockdown group/product/MedChemExpress
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
asgr1 knockdown group - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
MedChemExpress arg gly asp
Figure 1. <t>ASGR1</t> is critical in the progression of liver cancer. A, ASGR1 screening process based on the GEO and TCGA databases. B, IHC score of ASGR1 in matched tumor and nontumor tissues from 113 patients with liver cancer (left; the median and upper and lower quartiles of tumor areas are plotted in a box-and-whisker plot, P < 0.0001, paired Student t test); comparison of tumor volume between high and low IHC scores (middle, means SD, P ¼ 0.0469, unpaired Student t test); IHC scores of liver cancer tissues with and without vascular invasion (right; P ¼ 0.0366, unpaired Student t test). C, Left, IHC scores of tumor tissues at different pathological grades (P ¼ 0.0187, ANOVA). Right, survival analysis of patients with liver cancer with high and low IHC scores of ASGR1 (P ¼ 0.0022, log-rank test). D, Construction of ASGR1 knockout mice and establishment of the HDI model. The coding regions in ASGR1 transcript (ENSMUST00000146411.8) were precisely knocked out by CRISPR/Cas9 technology to construct ASGR1/ mice. Six-week ASGR1/ mice and wild-type (ASGR1wt/wt) mice were rapidly injected via tail vein with 2 mL of PBS containing 10 mg sleeping beauty (SB) transposon, 25 mg C-MYC, and 25 mg N-Ras plasmids to establish the HDI model. E, PET/CT results and livers of mice 2 weeks after the establishment of HDI model. F, Survival analysis of ASGR1wt/wt mice and ASGR1/ mice in HDI model (P ¼ 0.03, Log-rank test).
Arg Gly Asp, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/arg gly asp/product/MedChemExpress
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
arg gly asp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
MedChemExpress p0013 dtt medchemexpress
Figure 1. <t>ASGR1</t> is critical in the progression of liver cancer. A, ASGR1 screening process based on the GEO and TCGA databases. B, IHC score of ASGR1 in matched tumor and nontumor tissues from 113 patients with liver cancer (left; the median and upper and lower quartiles of tumor areas are plotted in a box-and-whisker plot, P < 0.0001, paired Student t test); comparison of tumor volume between high and low IHC scores (middle, means SD, P ¼ 0.0469, unpaired Student t test); IHC scores of liver cancer tissues with and without vascular invasion (right; P ¼ 0.0366, unpaired Student t test). C, Left, IHC scores of tumor tissues at different pathological grades (P ¼ 0.0187, ANOVA). Right, survival analysis of patients with liver cancer with high and low IHC scores of ASGR1 (P ¼ 0.0022, log-rank test). D, Construction of ASGR1 knockout mice and establishment of the HDI model. The coding regions in ASGR1 transcript (ENSMUST00000146411.8) were precisely knocked out by CRISPR/Cas9 technology to construct ASGR1/ mice. Six-week ASGR1/ mice and wild-type (ASGR1wt/wt) mice were rapidly injected via tail vein with 2 mL of PBS containing 10 mg sleeping beauty (SB) transposon, 25 mg C-MYC, and 25 mg N-Ras plasmids to establish the HDI model. E, PET/CT results and livers of mice 2 weeks after the establishment of HDI model. F, Survival analysis of ASGR1wt/wt mice and ASGR1/ mice in HDI model (P ¼ 0.03, Log-rank test).
P0013 Dtt Medchemexpress, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/p0013 dtt medchemexpress/product/MedChemExpress
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p0013 dtt medchemexpress - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
MedChemExpress su5416 hypoxia group
Figure 1. <t>ASGR1</t> is critical in the progression of liver cancer. A, ASGR1 screening process based on the GEO and TCGA databases. B, IHC score of ASGR1 in matched tumor and nontumor tissues from 113 patients with liver cancer (left; the median and upper and lower quartiles of tumor areas are plotted in a box-and-whisker plot, P < 0.0001, paired Student t test); comparison of tumor volume between high and low IHC scores (middle, means SD, P ¼ 0.0469, unpaired Student t test); IHC scores of liver cancer tissues with and without vascular invasion (right; P ¼ 0.0366, unpaired Student t test). C, Left, IHC scores of tumor tissues at different pathological grades (P ¼ 0.0187, ANOVA). Right, survival analysis of patients with liver cancer with high and low IHC scores of ASGR1 (P ¼ 0.0022, log-rank test). D, Construction of ASGR1 knockout mice and establishment of the HDI model. The coding regions in ASGR1 transcript (ENSMUST00000146411.8) were precisely knocked out by CRISPR/Cas9 technology to construct ASGR1/ mice. Six-week ASGR1/ mice and wild-type (ASGR1wt/wt) mice were rapidly injected via tail vein with 2 mL of PBS containing 10 mg sleeping beauty (SB) transposon, 25 mg C-MYC, and 25 mg N-Ras plasmids to establish the HDI model. E, PET/CT results and livers of mice 2 weeks after the establishment of HDI model. F, Survival analysis of ASGR1wt/wt mice and ASGR1/ mice in HDI model (P ¼ 0.03, Log-rank test).
Su5416 Hypoxia Group, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/su5416 hypoxia group/product/MedChemExpress
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
su5416 hypoxia group - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
MedChemExpress 3 5 4 trimethoxy trans stilbene
Figure 1. <t>ASGR1</t> is critical in the progression of liver cancer. A, ASGR1 screening process based on the GEO and TCGA databases. B, IHC score of ASGR1 in matched tumor and nontumor tissues from 113 patients with liver cancer (left; the median and upper and lower quartiles of tumor areas are plotted in a box-and-whisker plot, P < 0.0001, paired Student t test); comparison of tumor volume between high and low IHC scores (middle, means SD, P ¼ 0.0469, unpaired Student t test); IHC scores of liver cancer tissues with and without vascular invasion (right; P ¼ 0.0366, unpaired Student t test). C, Left, IHC scores of tumor tissues at different pathological grades (P ¼ 0.0187, ANOVA). Right, survival analysis of patients with liver cancer with high and low IHC scores of ASGR1 (P ¼ 0.0022, log-rank test). D, Construction of ASGR1 knockout mice and establishment of the HDI model. The coding regions in ASGR1 transcript (ENSMUST00000146411.8) were precisely knocked out by CRISPR/Cas9 technology to construct ASGR1/ mice. Six-week ASGR1/ mice and wild-type (ASGR1wt/wt) mice were rapidly injected via tail vein with 2 mL of PBS containing 10 mg sleeping beauty (SB) transposon, 25 mg C-MYC, and 25 mg N-Ras plasmids to establish the HDI model. E, PET/CT results and livers of mice 2 weeks after the establishment of HDI model. F, Survival analysis of ASGR1wt/wt mice and ASGR1/ mice in HDI model (P ¼ 0.03, Log-rank test).
3 5 4 Trimethoxy Trans Stilbene, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3 5 4 trimethoxy trans stilbene/product/MedChemExpress
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3 5 4 trimethoxy trans stilbene - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
MedChemExpress 48 114 ethyl ferulate spiranthes
Figure 1. <t>ASGR1</t> is critical in the progression of liver cancer. A, ASGR1 screening process based on the GEO and TCGA databases. B, IHC score of ASGR1 in matched tumor and nontumor tissues from 113 patients with liver cancer (left; the median and upper and lower quartiles of tumor areas are plotted in a box-and-whisker plot, P < 0.0001, paired Student t test); comparison of tumor volume between high and low IHC scores (middle, means SD, P ¼ 0.0469, unpaired Student t test); IHC scores of liver cancer tissues with and without vascular invasion (right; P ¼ 0.0366, unpaired Student t test). C, Left, IHC scores of tumor tissues at different pathological grades (P ¼ 0.0187, ANOVA). Right, survival analysis of patients with liver cancer with high and low IHC scores of ASGR1 (P ¼ 0.0022, log-rank test). D, Construction of ASGR1 knockout mice and establishment of the HDI model. The coding regions in ASGR1 transcript (ENSMUST00000146411.8) were precisely knocked out by CRISPR/Cas9 technology to construct ASGR1/ mice. Six-week ASGR1/ mice and wild-type (ASGR1wt/wt) mice were rapidly injected via tail vein with 2 mL of PBS containing 10 mg sleeping beauty (SB) transposon, 25 mg C-MYC, and 25 mg N-Ras plasmids to establish the HDI model. E, PET/CT results and livers of mice 2 weeks after the establishment of HDI model. F, Survival analysis of ASGR1wt/wt mice and ASGR1/ mice in HDI model (P ¼ 0.03, Log-rank test).
48 114 Ethyl Ferulate Spiranthes, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/48 114 ethyl ferulate spiranthes/product/MedChemExpress
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
48 114 ethyl ferulate spiranthes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
MedChemExpress human sost protein
Screening and analysis of high-affinity epitopes on <t>SOST.</t> (A) ELISA experiments were conducted to identify SOST fragments with strong binding affinity for ROMO, revealing that SOST 114–143 and SOST 143–173 exhibit significantly higher affinity ( P <0.01). (B) A schematic diagram delineating the binding functional regions associated with the high-affinity fragments of SOST. (C) ELISA results indicate that SOST 131–163 displays the highest affinity for ROMO ( P <0.01), thereby identifying it as a potent functional epitope of SOST. (D-a) SOST 131–163 fragment (highlighted in yellow) is located within the loop3 domain of <t>SOST</t> <t>protein.</t> (D-b) Docking studies indicate that SOST 131–163 fragment interacts with ROMO light chain, yielding a binding free energy of -25.8 kcal/mol and an interface area of 712.9 Ų. (D-c) Additionally, SOST 131–163 fragment can bind to the ROMO heavy chain, resulting in a binding free energy of -33.19 kcal/mol and an interface area of 451.6 Ų. (E) CTL epitopes within SOST 131–163 sequence include two strong binder epitopes and four weak binder epitopes. (F) HTL epitopes in SOST 131–163 sequence comprise one strong binder epitope and four weak binder epitopes. Predictions of B cell epitopes for SOST 131–163 sequence are illustrated, including predicted linear B cell epitopes (G) and predicted discontinuous B cell epitopes (H) .
Human Sost Protein, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human sost protein/product/MedChemExpress
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human sost protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
MedChemExpress carboxamide
Screening and analysis of high-affinity epitopes on <t>SOST.</t> (A) ELISA experiments were conducted to identify SOST fragments with strong binding affinity for ROMO, revealing that SOST 114–143 and SOST 143–173 exhibit significantly higher affinity ( P <0.01). (B) A schematic diagram delineating the binding functional regions associated with the high-affinity fragments of SOST. (C) ELISA results indicate that SOST 131–163 displays the highest affinity for ROMO ( P <0.01), thereby identifying it as a potent functional epitope of SOST. (D-a) SOST 131–163 fragment (highlighted in yellow) is located within the loop3 domain of <t>SOST</t> <t>protein.</t> (D-b) Docking studies indicate that SOST 131–163 fragment interacts with ROMO light chain, yielding a binding free energy of -25.8 kcal/mol and an interface area of 712.9 Ų. (D-c) Additionally, SOST 131–163 fragment can bind to the ROMO heavy chain, resulting in a binding free energy of -33.19 kcal/mol and an interface area of 451.6 Ų. (E) CTL epitopes within SOST 131–163 sequence include two strong binder epitopes and four weak binder epitopes. (F) HTL epitopes in SOST 131–163 sequence comprise one strong binder epitope and four weak binder epitopes. Predictions of B cell epitopes for SOST 131–163 sequence are illustrated, including predicted linear B cell epitopes (G) and predicted discontinuous B cell epitopes (H) .
Carboxamide, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/carboxamide/product/MedChemExpress
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
carboxamide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MedChemExpress 2 3 4 5 tetrahydrobenzo b 1 4 oxazepine 8 carbonitrile
Screening and analysis of high-affinity epitopes on <t>SOST.</t> (A) ELISA experiments were conducted to identify SOST fragments with strong binding affinity for ROMO, revealing that SOST 114–143 and SOST 143–173 exhibit significantly higher affinity ( P <0.01). (B) A schematic diagram delineating the binding functional regions associated with the high-affinity fragments of SOST. (C) ELISA results indicate that SOST 131–163 displays the highest affinity for ROMO ( P <0.01), thereby identifying it as a potent functional epitope of SOST. (D-a) SOST 131–163 fragment (highlighted in yellow) is located within the loop3 domain of <t>SOST</t> <t>protein.</t> (D-b) Docking studies indicate that SOST 131–163 fragment interacts with ROMO light chain, yielding a binding free energy of -25.8 kcal/mol and an interface area of 712.9 Ų. (D-c) Additionally, SOST 131–163 fragment can bind to the ROMO heavy chain, resulting in a binding free energy of -33.19 kcal/mol and an interface area of 451.6 Ų. (E) CTL epitopes within SOST 131–163 sequence include two strong binder epitopes and four weak binder epitopes. (F) HTL epitopes in SOST 131–163 sequence comprise one strong binder epitope and four weak binder epitopes. Predictions of B cell epitopes for SOST 131–163 sequence are illustrated, including predicted linear B cell epitopes (G) and predicted discontinuous B cell epitopes (H) .
2 3 4 5 Tetrahydrobenzo B 1 4 Oxazepine 8 Carbonitrile, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/2 3 4 5 tetrahydrobenzo b 1 4 oxazepine 8 carbonitrile/product/MedChemExpress
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
2 3 4 5 tetrahydrobenzo b 1 4 oxazepine 8 carbonitrile - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
MedChemExpress dopamine d1
Screening and analysis of high-affinity epitopes on <t>SOST.</t> (A) ELISA experiments were conducted to identify SOST fragments with strong binding affinity for ROMO, revealing that SOST 114–143 and SOST 143–173 exhibit significantly higher affinity ( P <0.01). (B) A schematic diagram delineating the binding functional regions associated with the high-affinity fragments of SOST. (C) ELISA results indicate that SOST 131–163 displays the highest affinity for ROMO ( P <0.01), thereby identifying it as a potent functional epitope of SOST. (D-a) SOST 131–163 fragment (highlighted in yellow) is located within the loop3 domain of <t>SOST</t> <t>protein.</t> (D-b) Docking studies indicate that SOST 131–163 fragment interacts with ROMO light chain, yielding a binding free energy of -25.8 kcal/mol and an interface area of 712.9 Ų. (D-c) Additionally, SOST 131–163 fragment can bind to the ROMO heavy chain, resulting in a binding free energy of -33.19 kcal/mol and an interface area of 451.6 Ų. (E) CTL epitopes within SOST 131–163 sequence include two strong binder epitopes and four weak binder epitopes. (F) HTL epitopes in SOST 131–163 sequence comprise one strong binder epitope and four weak binder epitopes. Predictions of B cell epitopes for SOST 131–163 sequence are illustrated, including predicted linear B cell epitopes (G) and predicted discontinuous B cell epitopes (H) .
Dopamine D1, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dopamine d1/product/MedChemExpress
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dopamine d1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
MedChemExpress service registry no
Screening and analysis of high-affinity epitopes on <t>SOST.</t> (A) ELISA experiments were conducted to identify SOST fragments with strong binding affinity for ROMO, revealing that SOST 114–143 and SOST 143–173 exhibit significantly higher affinity ( P <0.01). (B) A schematic diagram delineating the binding functional regions associated with the high-affinity fragments of SOST. (C) ELISA results indicate that SOST 131–163 displays the highest affinity for ROMO ( P <0.01), thereby identifying it as a potent functional epitope of SOST. (D-a) SOST 131–163 fragment (highlighted in yellow) is located within the loop3 domain of <t>SOST</t> <t>protein.</t> (D-b) Docking studies indicate that SOST 131–163 fragment interacts with ROMO light chain, yielding a binding free energy of -25.8 kcal/mol and an interface area of 712.9 Ų. (D-c) Additionally, SOST 131–163 fragment can bind to the ROMO heavy chain, resulting in a binding free energy of -33.19 kcal/mol and an interface area of 451.6 Ų. (E) CTL epitopes within SOST 131–163 sequence include two strong binder epitopes and four weak binder epitopes. (F) HTL epitopes in SOST 131–163 sequence comprise one strong binder epitope and four weak binder epitopes. Predictions of B cell epitopes for SOST 131–163 sequence are illustrated, including predicted linear B cell epitopes (G) and predicted discontinuous B cell epitopes (H) .
Service Registry No, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/service registry no/product/MedChemExpress
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
service registry no - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 1. ASGR1 is critical in the progression of liver cancer. A, ASGR1 screening process based on the GEO and TCGA databases. B, IHC score of ASGR1 in matched tumor and nontumor tissues from 113 patients with liver cancer (left; the median and upper and lower quartiles of tumor areas are plotted in a box-and-whisker plot, P < 0.0001, paired Student t test); comparison of tumor volume between high and low IHC scores (middle, means SD, P ¼ 0.0469, unpaired Student t test); IHC scores of liver cancer tissues with and without vascular invasion (right; P ¼ 0.0366, unpaired Student t test). C, Left, IHC scores of tumor tissues at different pathological grades (P ¼ 0.0187, ANOVA). Right, survival analysis of patients with liver cancer with high and low IHC scores of ASGR1 (P ¼ 0.0022, log-rank test). D, Construction of ASGR1 knockout mice and establishment of the HDI model. The coding regions in ASGR1 transcript (ENSMUST00000146411.8) were precisely knocked out by CRISPR/Cas9 technology to construct ASGR1/ mice. Six-week ASGR1/ mice and wild-type (ASGR1wt/wt) mice were rapidly injected via tail vein with 2 mL of PBS containing 10 mg sleeping beauty (SB) transposon, 25 mg C-MYC, and 25 mg N-Ras plasmids to establish the HDI model. E, PET/CT results and livers of mice 2 weeks after the establishment of HDI model. F, Survival analysis of ASGR1wt/wt mice and ASGR1/ mice in HDI model (P ¼ 0.03, Log-rank test).

Journal: Cancer Research

Article Title: Asialoglycoprotein Receptor 1 Functions as a Tumor Suppressor in Liver Cancer via Inhibition of STAT3

doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-4337

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1. ASGR1 is critical in the progression of liver cancer. A, ASGR1 screening process based on the GEO and TCGA databases. B, IHC score of ASGR1 in matched tumor and nontumor tissues from 113 patients with liver cancer (left; the median and upper and lower quartiles of tumor areas are plotted in a box-and-whisker plot, P < 0.0001, paired Student t test); comparison of tumor volume between high and low IHC scores (middle, means SD, P ¼ 0.0469, unpaired Student t test); IHC scores of liver cancer tissues with and without vascular invasion (right; P ¼ 0.0366, unpaired Student t test). C, Left, IHC scores of tumor tissues at different pathological grades (P ¼ 0.0187, ANOVA). Right, survival analysis of patients with liver cancer with high and low IHC scores of ASGR1 (P ¼ 0.0022, log-rank test). D, Construction of ASGR1 knockout mice and establishment of the HDI model. The coding regions in ASGR1 transcript (ENSMUST00000146411.8) were precisely knocked out by CRISPR/Cas9 technology to construct ASGR1/ mice. Six-week ASGR1/ mice and wild-type (ASGR1wt/wt) mice were rapidly injected via tail vein with 2 mL of PBS containing 10 mg sleeping beauty (SB) transposon, 25 mg C-MYC, and 25 mg N-Ras plasmids to establish the HDI model. E, PET/CT results and livers of mice 2 weeks after the establishment of HDI model. F, Survival analysis of ASGR1wt/wt mice and ASGR1/ mice in HDI model (P ¼ 0.03, Log-rank test).

Article Snippet: One week after xenograft tumor formation, mice in the ASGR1 knockdown group were intraperitoneally injected with PBS or cryptotanshinone (50 mg/kg, 0.1 mL/10g, MCE) every two days.

Techniques: Whisker Assay, Comparison, Knock-Out, CRISPR, Construct, Injection, Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography

Figure 2. ASGR1 inhibits liver cancer growth. A, CCK-8 assay of liver cancer cells (means SD, unpaired Student t test). B and C, Quantitative results of the clone formation assay (means SD, unpaired Student t test) and EdU experiment on liver cancer cells (box-and-whisker plot, unpaired Student t test). D, SK-Hep-1 cells overexpressing ASGR1 and control cells were used to construct subcutaneous xenograft tumor models in nude mice. The volume and weight of the xenograft tumor were measured (means SD, unpaired Student t test). E, IHC was used to detect the expression of ASGR1 and Ki-67 in subcutaneous xenograft tumors. F, Left, orthotopic liver tumor model in nude mice with ASGR1 stable knockdown cells or ASGR1 stable overexpression cells and control cells. Right, the volume and weight of xenograft in each group were measured (means SD, unpaired Student t test). G, Left, PET/CT results and livers of the HDI model constructed by ASGR1 knockout mice. Middle, LW/BW before and after combined injection of PT3-EF1a-ASGR1 (E_ASGR1) or PT3-EF1a (E_control) plasmid (means SD, unpaired Student t test). Right, standard uptake value (SUV) of liver in PET/CT (means SD, unpaired Student t test). H, Detection of the liver function indices AST, ALT, and LDH levels in the serum of HDI model mice (means SD, unpaired Student t test).

Journal: Cancer Research

Article Title: Asialoglycoprotein Receptor 1 Functions as a Tumor Suppressor in Liver Cancer via Inhibition of STAT3

doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-4337

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. ASGR1 inhibits liver cancer growth. A, CCK-8 assay of liver cancer cells (means SD, unpaired Student t test). B and C, Quantitative results of the clone formation assay (means SD, unpaired Student t test) and EdU experiment on liver cancer cells (box-and-whisker plot, unpaired Student t test). D, SK-Hep-1 cells overexpressing ASGR1 and control cells were used to construct subcutaneous xenograft tumor models in nude mice. The volume and weight of the xenograft tumor were measured (means SD, unpaired Student t test). E, IHC was used to detect the expression of ASGR1 and Ki-67 in subcutaneous xenograft tumors. F, Left, orthotopic liver tumor model in nude mice with ASGR1 stable knockdown cells or ASGR1 stable overexpression cells and control cells. Right, the volume and weight of xenograft in each group were measured (means SD, unpaired Student t test). G, Left, PET/CT results and livers of the HDI model constructed by ASGR1 knockout mice. Middle, LW/BW before and after combined injection of PT3-EF1a-ASGR1 (E_ASGR1) or PT3-EF1a (E_control) plasmid (means SD, unpaired Student t test). Right, standard uptake value (SUV) of liver in PET/CT (means SD, unpaired Student t test). H, Detection of the liver function indices AST, ALT, and LDH levels in the serum of HDI model mice (means SD, unpaired Student t test).

Article Snippet: One week after xenograft tumor formation, mice in the ASGR1 knockdown group were intraperitoneally injected with PBS or cryptotanshinone (50 mg/kg, 0.1 mL/10g, MCE) every two days.

Techniques: CCK-8 Assay, Tube Formation Assay, Whisker Assay, Control, Construct, Expressing, Knockdown, Over Expression, Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography, Knock-Out, Injection, Plasmid Preparation

Figure 3. ASGR1 suppresses liver cancer progression through inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation. A, Changes in the transcription levels of ASGR1-overexpressing and negative control SNU449 cells were detected by RNA sequencing (n ¼ 6). R studio was used for differential analysis, and 2,843 differential genes were screened out (left; R package: DESeq2;FDR<0.05, |LogFC|>0.6). Differential geneswere enriched with respect to each transcription factor by R studio in the regulatory target gene sets of the molecular signatures database (right; R package: clusterprofiler). B, After overexpression of ASGR1 in SNU449 and SK-Hep-1 cells and knockdown of ASGR1 in HCCLM3 cells, the phosphorylation levels of STAT3 at tyrosine 705 and serine 727 sites were detected by immunoblotting. C, The expression of Tyr705STAT3 was investigated by immunofluorescence assay. D, Changes in Tyr705STAT3 and Ser727STAT3 in the cytoplasm and nucleus of SNU449 cells were detected. E, Changes in STAT3 target genes in SNU449 cells were detected by RT-qPCR (means SD, unpaired Student t test). F, IHC results of the HDI model. G, STAT3 target genes in the livers of ASGR1/ and ASGR1wt/wt mice were detected by RT-qPCR (means SD, unpaired Student t test). H, The expression of Tyr705STAT3 in SNU449 cells stimulated with IL6 (5 ng/mL) was detected. I, Tyr705STAT3 expression in HCCLM3 cells was detected after treatment with CTS (1 mg/mL). J, HCCLM3 cells were injected subcutaneously in 6-week-old nude mice to form xenograft tumors. One week after xenograft tumor formation, mice were intraperitoneally injected with PBS or CTS (50 mg/kg, 0.1 mL/10g) every two days. The volume of the xenograft tumor of the mice was measured every two days (means SD, unpaired Student t test). ns, nonsignificant.

Journal: Cancer Research

Article Title: Asialoglycoprotein Receptor 1 Functions as a Tumor Suppressor in Liver Cancer via Inhibition of STAT3

doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-4337

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. ASGR1 suppresses liver cancer progression through inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation. A, Changes in the transcription levels of ASGR1-overexpressing and negative control SNU449 cells were detected by RNA sequencing (n ¼ 6). R studio was used for differential analysis, and 2,843 differential genes were screened out (left; R package: DESeq2;FDR<0.05, |LogFC|>0.6). Differential geneswere enriched with respect to each transcription factor by R studio in the regulatory target gene sets of the molecular signatures database (right; R package: clusterprofiler). B, After overexpression of ASGR1 in SNU449 and SK-Hep-1 cells and knockdown of ASGR1 in HCCLM3 cells, the phosphorylation levels of STAT3 at tyrosine 705 and serine 727 sites were detected by immunoblotting. C, The expression of Tyr705STAT3 was investigated by immunofluorescence assay. D, Changes in Tyr705STAT3 and Ser727STAT3 in the cytoplasm and nucleus of SNU449 cells were detected. E, Changes in STAT3 target genes in SNU449 cells were detected by RT-qPCR (means SD, unpaired Student t test). F, IHC results of the HDI model. G, STAT3 target genes in the livers of ASGR1/ and ASGR1wt/wt mice were detected by RT-qPCR (means SD, unpaired Student t test). H, The expression of Tyr705STAT3 in SNU449 cells stimulated with IL6 (5 ng/mL) was detected. I, Tyr705STAT3 expression in HCCLM3 cells was detected after treatment with CTS (1 mg/mL). J, HCCLM3 cells were injected subcutaneously in 6-week-old nude mice to form xenograft tumors. One week after xenograft tumor formation, mice were intraperitoneally injected with PBS or CTS (50 mg/kg, 0.1 mL/10g) every two days. The volume of the xenograft tumor of the mice was measured every two days (means SD, unpaired Student t test). ns, nonsignificant.

Article Snippet: One week after xenograft tumor formation, mice in the ASGR1 knockdown group were intraperitoneally injected with PBS or cryptotanshinone (50 mg/kg, 0.1 mL/10g, MCE) every two days.

Techniques: Inhibition, Phospho-proteomics, Negative Control, RNA Sequencing, Over Expression, Knockdown, Western Blot, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Injection

Figure 4. NLK interacts with ASGR1 and binds to the SH2 domain of STAT3. A, NLK was identified as a potential ASGR1-binding protein by IP/MS. B and C, Immunoblot analysis of the endogenous interaction between ASGR1 and NLK after coimmunoprecipitation in SK-Hep-1 and SNU449 cells. D, Immunoblot analysis of endogenous IP between STAT3 and NLK in SK-Hep-1 and SNU449 cells. E, Exogenous coimmunoprecipitation experiment of Flag-tagged NLK with HA-tagged STAT3 or STAT3-D580–670aa mutant was performed in HEK293T cells. F, Immunoblot analysis of Tyr705STAT3 and Ser727STAT3 expression after transfection with the NLK-Flag plasmid.

Journal: Cancer Research

Article Title: Asialoglycoprotein Receptor 1 Functions as a Tumor Suppressor in Liver Cancer via Inhibition of STAT3

doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-4337

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. NLK interacts with ASGR1 and binds to the SH2 domain of STAT3. A, NLK was identified as a potential ASGR1-binding protein by IP/MS. B and C, Immunoblot analysis of the endogenous interaction between ASGR1 and NLK after coimmunoprecipitation in SK-Hep-1 and SNU449 cells. D, Immunoblot analysis of endogenous IP between STAT3 and NLK in SK-Hep-1 and SNU449 cells. E, Exogenous coimmunoprecipitation experiment of Flag-tagged NLK with HA-tagged STAT3 or STAT3-D580–670aa mutant was performed in HEK293T cells. F, Immunoblot analysis of Tyr705STAT3 and Ser727STAT3 expression after transfection with the NLK-Flag plasmid.

Article Snippet: One week after xenograft tumor formation, mice in the ASGR1 knockdown group were intraperitoneally injected with PBS or cryptotanshinone (50 mg/kg, 0.1 mL/10g, MCE) every two days.

Techniques: Binding Assay, Protein-Protein interactions, Western Blot, Mutagenesis, Expressing, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation

Figure 5. NLK inhibits JAK1-mediated STAT3 phosphorylation and STAT3 dimerization. A, HCCLM3 cells with or without ASGR1 knockdown were transduced with NLK plasmid. Tyr705STAT3 expression was determined by immunoblotting. B, ASGR1 was overexpressed in NLK knockdown SK-Hep-1 cells, and Tyr705STAT3 expression was detected by immunoblot. C and D, Left, HA-IP experiments with indicated plasmids were performed in HEK293T cells. Right, relative quantification of Flag relative to HA in the IP protein (means SD, unpairedStudentt test).E, Immunoblot of NLK affecting endogenous interactions between STAT3and JAK1. Relative quantification of JAK1 relative to STAT3 in IP protein (means SD, unpaired Student t test). F, Immunoblot of ASGR1 affecting endogenous interactions between STAT3 and NLK. Relative quantification of STAT3 relative to NLK in IP protein (means SD, unpaired Student t test). G, After transfection of the indicated plasmids, Tyr705STAT3 expression was detected by immunoblotting. H, Effects of the K167M mutation of NLK on STAT3 phosphorylation. I, Effects of the D264A and T298A mutation of NLK on STAT3 phosphorylation. J, Flag-IP experiment with indicated that plasmids were performed in HEK293T cells. Relative quantification of HA relative to Flag in IP protein (means SD, unpaired Student t test). ns, nonsignificant.

Journal: Cancer Research

Article Title: Asialoglycoprotein Receptor 1 Functions as a Tumor Suppressor in Liver Cancer via Inhibition of STAT3

doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-4337

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. NLK inhibits JAK1-mediated STAT3 phosphorylation and STAT3 dimerization. A, HCCLM3 cells with or without ASGR1 knockdown were transduced with NLK plasmid. Tyr705STAT3 expression was determined by immunoblotting. B, ASGR1 was overexpressed in NLK knockdown SK-Hep-1 cells, and Tyr705STAT3 expression was detected by immunoblot. C and D, Left, HA-IP experiments with indicated plasmids were performed in HEK293T cells. Right, relative quantification of Flag relative to HA in the IP protein (means SD, unpairedStudentt test).E, Immunoblot of NLK affecting endogenous interactions between STAT3and JAK1. Relative quantification of JAK1 relative to STAT3 in IP protein (means SD, unpaired Student t test). F, Immunoblot of ASGR1 affecting endogenous interactions between STAT3 and NLK. Relative quantification of STAT3 relative to NLK in IP protein (means SD, unpaired Student t test). G, After transfection of the indicated plasmids, Tyr705STAT3 expression was detected by immunoblotting. H, Effects of the K167M mutation of NLK on STAT3 phosphorylation. I, Effects of the D264A and T298A mutation of NLK on STAT3 phosphorylation. J, Flag-IP experiment with indicated that plasmids were performed in HEK293T cells. Relative quantification of HA relative to Flag in IP protein (means SD, unpaired Student t test). ns, nonsignificant.

Article Snippet: One week after xenograft tumor formation, mice in the ASGR1 knockdown group were intraperitoneally injected with PBS or cryptotanshinone (50 mg/kg, 0.1 mL/10g, MCE) every two days.

Techniques: Phospho-proteomics, Knockdown, Transduction, Plasmid Preparation, Expressing, Western Blot, Transfection, Mutagenesis

Figure 6. NLK competes with GP130 for binding to STAT3. A, Immunoblot of NLK affecting endogenous interactions between STAT3 and GP130. Relative quantification of GP130 relative to STAT3 in IP protein (means SD, unpaired Student t test). B, Immunoblot analysis of endogenous interaction between GP130 and NLK. C, Immunoblot analysis of endogenous interaction between GP130 and ASGR1. D, Immunoblot of ASGR1 affecting endogenous interactions between NLK and GP130. Quantification of NLK relative to GP130 in IP protein (means SD, unpaired Student t test). E, GP130-IP experiments with indicated plasmid were performed in SK- Hep-1 cells. Relative quantification of STAT3 relative to GP130 in IP protein (means SD, unpaired Student t test). F, PT3-EF1A-NLK–wild-type (E_NLK-WT) and E_ASGR1 plasmids were used for combined injection in the HDI model, and PET/CT was used to observe the tumorigenesis. Top, standard uptake value (SUV) of liver of HDI mice in PET/CT (means SD, unpaired Student t test). Bottom, ratio of liver weight to body weight of HDI mice (means SD, unpaired Student t test).

Journal: Cancer Research

Article Title: Asialoglycoprotein Receptor 1 Functions as a Tumor Suppressor in Liver Cancer via Inhibition of STAT3

doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-4337

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 6. NLK competes with GP130 for binding to STAT3. A, Immunoblot of NLK affecting endogenous interactions between STAT3 and GP130. Relative quantification of GP130 relative to STAT3 in IP protein (means SD, unpaired Student t test). B, Immunoblot analysis of endogenous interaction between GP130 and NLK. C, Immunoblot analysis of endogenous interaction between GP130 and ASGR1. D, Immunoblot of ASGR1 affecting endogenous interactions between NLK and GP130. Quantification of NLK relative to GP130 in IP protein (means SD, unpaired Student t test). E, GP130-IP experiments with indicated plasmid were performed in SK- Hep-1 cells. Relative quantification of STAT3 relative to GP130 in IP protein (means SD, unpaired Student t test). F, PT3-EF1A-NLK–wild-type (E_NLK-WT) and E_ASGR1 plasmids were used for combined injection in the HDI model, and PET/CT was used to observe the tumorigenesis. Top, standard uptake value (SUV) of liver of HDI mice in PET/CT (means SD, unpaired Student t test). Bottom, ratio of liver weight to body weight of HDI mice (means SD, unpaired Student t test).

Article Snippet: One week after xenograft tumor formation, mice in the ASGR1 knockdown group were intraperitoneally injected with PBS or cryptotanshinone (50 mg/kg, 0.1 mL/10g, MCE) every two days.

Techniques: Binding Assay, Western Blot, Plasmid Preparation, Injection, Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography

Figure 7. NLK combines with and silences STAT3 depending on the NLK domain region. A, According to the domain sequence of NLK in UniProt, six NLK truncations were constructed. These truncations are NLK-domain (Flag-NLK-D), NLK-N-terminal (Flag-NLK-N), NLK-C-terminal (Flag-NLK-C), NLK-domain deletion mutation (Flag-NLK-DD), NLK-C-terminal deletion mutation (Flag-NLK-DC), and NLK-N-terminal deletion mutation (Flag-NLK-DN). B and E, Flag-IP experiments with indicated NLK truncations with HA-tagged STAT3 were performed in HEK293T cells. Relative quantification of HA relative to Flag in IP protein (means SD, unpaired Student t test). C and D, The protein level of Tyr705STAT3 was determined by immunoblotting in ASGR1 knockdown HCCLM3 cells transfected with the indicated plasmids. F, ASGR1 knockout mice were used to construct HDI models. PT3-EF1A-NLK-domain (E_NLK-D), PT3-EF1A-NLK–C-terminal deletion mutation (E_NLK-DC), PT3-EF1A-NLK–N-terminal deletion mutation (E_NLK-DN), and E_control plasmids were used for combined injection, and PET/CT was used to observe the formation of liver cancer. G, Top, ratio of liver weight to body weight of HDI mice (means SD, unpaired Student t test). Bottom, standard uptake value (SUV) of liver of HDI mice in PET/CT (means SD, unpaired Student t test). H, IHC results of liver cancer in HDI mice. ns, nonsignificant.

Journal: Cancer Research

Article Title: Asialoglycoprotein Receptor 1 Functions as a Tumor Suppressor in Liver Cancer via Inhibition of STAT3

doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-4337

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 7. NLK combines with and silences STAT3 depending on the NLK domain region. A, According to the domain sequence of NLK in UniProt, six NLK truncations were constructed. These truncations are NLK-domain (Flag-NLK-D), NLK-N-terminal (Flag-NLK-N), NLK-C-terminal (Flag-NLK-C), NLK-domain deletion mutation (Flag-NLK-DD), NLK-C-terminal deletion mutation (Flag-NLK-DC), and NLK-N-terminal deletion mutation (Flag-NLK-DN). B and E, Flag-IP experiments with indicated NLK truncations with HA-tagged STAT3 were performed in HEK293T cells. Relative quantification of HA relative to Flag in IP protein (means SD, unpaired Student t test). C and D, The protein level of Tyr705STAT3 was determined by immunoblotting in ASGR1 knockdown HCCLM3 cells transfected with the indicated plasmids. F, ASGR1 knockout mice were used to construct HDI models. PT3-EF1A-NLK-domain (E_NLK-D), PT3-EF1A-NLK–C-terminal deletion mutation (E_NLK-DC), PT3-EF1A-NLK–N-terminal deletion mutation (E_NLK-DN), and E_control plasmids were used for combined injection, and PET/CT was used to observe the formation of liver cancer. G, Top, ratio of liver weight to body weight of HDI mice (means SD, unpaired Student t test). Bottom, standard uptake value (SUV) of liver of HDI mice in PET/CT (means SD, unpaired Student t test). H, IHC results of liver cancer in HDI mice. ns, nonsignificant.

Article Snippet: One week after xenograft tumor formation, mice in the ASGR1 knockdown group were intraperitoneally injected with PBS or cryptotanshinone (50 mg/kg, 0.1 mL/10g, MCE) every two days.

Techniques: Sequencing, Construct, Mutagenesis, Western Blot, Knockdown, Transfection, Knock-Out, Control, Injection, Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography

Screening and analysis of high-affinity epitopes on SOST. (A) ELISA experiments were conducted to identify SOST fragments with strong binding affinity for ROMO, revealing that SOST 114–143 and SOST 143–173 exhibit significantly higher affinity ( P <0.01). (B) A schematic diagram delineating the binding functional regions associated with the high-affinity fragments of SOST. (C) ELISA results indicate that SOST 131–163 displays the highest affinity for ROMO ( P <0.01), thereby identifying it as a potent functional epitope of SOST. (D-a) SOST 131–163 fragment (highlighted in yellow) is located within the loop3 domain of SOST protein. (D-b) Docking studies indicate that SOST 131–163 fragment interacts with ROMO light chain, yielding a binding free energy of -25.8 kcal/mol and an interface area of 712.9 Ų. (D-c) Additionally, SOST 131–163 fragment can bind to the ROMO heavy chain, resulting in a binding free energy of -33.19 kcal/mol and an interface area of 451.6 Ų. (E) CTL epitopes within SOST 131–163 sequence include two strong binder epitopes and four weak binder epitopes. (F) HTL epitopes in SOST 131–163 sequence comprise one strong binder epitope and four weak binder epitopes. Predictions of B cell epitopes for SOST 131–163 sequence are illustrated, including predicted linear B cell epitopes (G) and predicted discontinuous B cell epitopes (H) .

Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

Article Title: In silico design of novel precision vaccine targeting sclerostin epitopes for osteoporosis prevention and treatment

doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1644437

Figure Lengend Snippet: Screening and analysis of high-affinity epitopes on SOST. (A) ELISA experiments were conducted to identify SOST fragments with strong binding affinity for ROMO, revealing that SOST 114–143 and SOST 143–173 exhibit significantly higher affinity ( P <0.01). (B) A schematic diagram delineating the binding functional regions associated with the high-affinity fragments of SOST. (C) ELISA results indicate that SOST 131–163 displays the highest affinity for ROMO ( P <0.01), thereby identifying it as a potent functional epitope of SOST. (D-a) SOST 131–163 fragment (highlighted in yellow) is located within the loop3 domain of SOST protein. (D-b) Docking studies indicate that SOST 131–163 fragment interacts with ROMO light chain, yielding a binding free energy of -25.8 kcal/mol and an interface area of 712.9 Ų. (D-c) Additionally, SOST 131–163 fragment can bind to the ROMO heavy chain, resulting in a binding free energy of -33.19 kcal/mol and an interface area of 451.6 Ų. (E) CTL epitopes within SOST 131–163 sequence include two strong binder epitopes and four weak binder epitopes. (F) HTL epitopes in SOST 131–163 sequence comprise one strong binder epitope and four weak binder epitopes. Predictions of B cell epitopes for SOST 131–163 sequence are illustrated, including predicted linear B cell epitopes (G) and predicted discontinuous B cell epitopes (H) .

Article Snippet: In brief, 1 μg/mL of human SOST protein (MedChemExpress Inc.) was coated onto the wells of MaxiSorp microtiter plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) and incubated overnight at 4°C.

Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Binding Assay, Functional Assay, Sequencing